Friday, August 25, 2006

What Would Liberals Do to Stop Terror?

Toon Credit: Glenn McCoy

UPDATE: I separated yesterday's post into 2 parts since I wanted to focus more on this one paragraph. It didn't really go with yesterday's post and I wanted to vent a lot more about this issue. Make sure you look at yesterday's post since I added some to that one also.

This cartoon sums it all up with Dems and their take on the War on Terror. The other night Bob Beckel was filling in for Alan Colmes on Hannity & Colmes. He was screaming that Hannity and other conservatives were calling him a traitor even though they never did. I think the Dems have a little bit of a guilty conscience. They want to gut all our national security programs, they want to pull out of the War on Terror and they want to appease terrorists and terrorist' nations and yet we aren't allowed to call them un-patriotic or traitors. Do we want to trust the security of our country to these people? I don't think so.

Ann says it extremely well in her latest column entitled: WHAT PART OF THE WAR ON TERRORISM DO THEY SUPPORT? She spells out how they are against every significant part of the War against terrorism:
--they are adamantly opposed to the Iraq war. You know, the war where the U.S. military is killing thousands upon thousands of terrorists (described in the media as "Iraqi civilians," even if they are from Jordan, like the now-dead leader of al-Qaida in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi). That war.

--They oppose the National Security Agency listening to people who are calling specific phone numbers found on al-Qaida cell phones and computers.

--Democrats oppose the detainment of Taliban and al-Qaida soldiers at our military base in Guantanamo, Cuba.

--Democrats oppose the Patriot Act, the most important piece of legislation passed since 9/11, designed to make the United States less of a theme park for would-be terrorists.

--They oppose profiling Muslims at airports.

--They oppose every bust of a terrorist cell, sneering that the cells in Lackawanna, New York City, Miami, Chicago and London weren't a real threat like, say, a nondenominational prayer before a high school football game. Now that's a threat.

The more I think about this subject the more upset I get. I watched Hannity & Colmes again last night and Ann Coulter was debating Michael Brown about the Dems and National Security. Ann was making the points from her column and it expresses so much of what I have been thinking. What part of the War on Terror do liberals support? I would like any liberal to come on this blog and answer that question for me. The answer is they don't support any of it. So then Sean asked Michael Brown what he would do to stop terrorism. I literally laughed out loud because #1 he couldn't really come up with an answer and #2 when he finally came up with some kind of response he said they would engage people more. ENGAGE PEOPLE MORE!!!! Thats what liberals would do to combat terrorism. This is insane.

In doing phonecalls 3 times a week I am talking to a lot of people. I think I will scream if I hear one more person whine about how awful the war in Iraq is going. The next person who does bring this up I am going to challenge them. If Bush is doing such an awful job WHAT WOULD YOU DO TO COMBAT TERRORISM? The Dems and the MSM are nothing but a bunch of pessimists and defeatists. They have drug this country down by constantly beating the drum on this on TV and you have so many people who have been spoonfed this that they are falling prey to it. Where are people's backbones? Do we not remember 9/11? Do we think fighting terrorists is going to be a picnic? We are facing a serious threat and the answer is not to kick the can down the road like Clinton did or to appease the enemy.

I stand solidly behind the president on fighting terrorism. For those defeatists who have nothing but criticism for the president and the War in Iraq, what would you do? You claim to support the War on Terrorism but you don't support any of the things we are doing to fight terrorists. I shudder to think of our national security in the hands of liberal democrats. If the American people put them back in charge we will be facing a lot more 9/11's. Of that you can be sure.

No comments: