Friday, December 30, 2005

Conservative Profile #1---John Ashcroft


Ever since I started this blog I wanted to do profiles on Conservatives that I respect and admire. Once I figured out how to put pictures on my blog I knew I had to put up this picture. This is a picture of my congressman,Sam Graves, me and John Ashcroft. So I figured John Ashcroft would be an awesome person to start with.

At one of the Republican fundraisers I got to volunteer at, John Ashcroft was there. I was very excited. Ever since I first moved to Missouri in '92 I have been a big fan of his. He is one of those men who has firm principles and never deviates from them. And as we all know that is a rarity in today's world let alone in D.C. I had always viewed him as humble, honest and a man of integrity. When I met him I am proud to say that he came across as just that. I was very nervous and yet I mustered up my confidence and introduced myself to him. He was so great. He was very nice and said his name when he shook my hand. I was cracking up because, like I didn't know who he was. He was very kind and humble. In his speech he made jokes at his own expense and was very gracious. It was a great day for me.

So I had a lot of fun doing research on him for this profile. I found some neat websites in the process but was also disappointed in how many links were dedicated to trashing him. Even Wikipedia dedicated most of their info to what his critics said about him. Amazingly one of the most positive pieces about him was written by the BBC of all places.

He was born in 1942 in Chicago but grew up in Springfield, Missouri. His father was an Assembly of God minister and he grew up in the church. He is a born again Christian and his faith has always been an integral part of his life. He graduated with honors from Yale and went to law school at the University of Chicago where he graduated in 1967. He taught business law at Southwest Missouri State University before entering politics. In the 70's he held several positions in Missouri state government. He went from being state auditor, to assistant attorney-general to the attorney general where he served until 1985. In '85 he became Governor of Missouri and stayed there until '93. In 1994 (when I finally got to vote for him) he was elected to the U.S. Senate and started his term in '95. He was a great senator and I was never disappointed in decisions that he made or votes that he cast. He was a solid conservative with core values.

Then in 2000 we had a historical senate race. Ashcroft was ahead in the polls and I wasn't worried about his re-election at all. I'm sure on the Beltway Boys on Fox News that they rated him in the safe column to win. But then there was a freak accident. His opponent Democrat Mel Carnahan (the Governor of Missouri at the time)died in a plane crash just 2 weeks before the election. Ashcroft being the man of integrity that he is stopped campaigning out of respect. Then the Lieutenant Governor who had replaced Carnahan as Governor announced that Carnahan's widow would serve if Carnahan won since it was too late for his name to be removed from the ballots. Then between the sympathy vote and the corruption spun by Jesse Jackson in St. Louis where the polls were illegally kept open hours later than 7:00, Carnahan (a dead man) won the election. I was crushed. Between having panic attacks over the 30 day standoff between Gore and W and Ashcroft losing, I was a mess. But as always Ashcroft graciously accepted the defeat and was kinder to Jean Carnahan than I ever would've been. My other senator, Republican Kit Bond, was spitting fire over the injustice of the corruption in St. Louis which cost us the Governorship and the senate seat.

And then it was amazing to see the irony of how it all worked out. John Ashcroft was nominated by W to be Attorney General. (I was a very happy camper the day that was announced.) A Republican won the senate seat against Jean Carnahan in a special election in 2002 and Republican Matt Blunt won the Governorship in 2004. So all Jesse Jackson's corruption ended up giving the democrats very short-lived victories.

Anyway, all that to say Ashcroft has been a wonderful public servant and a man to look up to. Even the Associated Press article about him admitted that his public life was scandal-free. The White House bio of him quoted W as saying this about him: "a man of great integrity, a man of great judgment and a man who knows the law". I couldn't say it any better.

Ashcroft was known for being unashamed of being a strong conservative and would say, there are two things you find in the middle of the road: "a moderate and a dead skunk", and that he didn't want to be either. And to that I say, Amen!!

Tuesday, December 27, 2005

Oliver North & The USO


Oliver North is one of those people who had been demonized by the MSM. Since I wasn't paying attention to politics in the 80's I didn't know much of what was going on until I started researching things in the 90's. And I remember being shocked at how great a guy North was after seeing him and hearing him talk for myself. It was one of the times I realized I had unwillingly let the MSM shape my views of someone. All that to say I think North is an amazing man and a Great American.

He had a great show on the other night talking about the different entertainers that have sacrificed time and money to entertain the troops over the years through the USO. It greatly increased my respect level for many of them. I thought I would highlight several of them since we are always bashing Hollywood when they do something wrong. I thought it would be nice to point out when they do something right.

One of the people that most surprised me was Joan Jett. She has been singing to the troops since the 80's. She purposely asks to go to places that aren't as comfortable. She figures the people in remote areas need a bigger morale booster than those in nicer places. And she doesn't mind sacrificing comfort. Pretty amazing.

Everyone knows about Bob Hope. But it is worth mentioning what an awesome support he has always been to the troops. When he died I remember them talking about how many presidents he had met and how many wars he had entertained troops. It is pretty impressive and really instills respect in me for what a great guy he was.



It also is worth mentioning that these entertainers do this at their own expense and don't get paid. Some of the others were Ann Margaret (who I didn't realize was a big star in the 60's & 70's)(reveals my age and that I'm not a fan of old movies), Wayne Newton, Bo Derek and Gary Sinise. My hats are off to them for supporting our troops!!


UPDATE: I am switching computers tomorrow and getting road runner so I may be out of commission for a day or two. Hopefully not longer than that.

Also, check out an excellent poem on Sandy's Blog. It is a must read!!

Monday, December 26, 2005

Events of 2005


I wanted to do a shorter and lighter post today. So I thought I would post the little things I listed in my Christmas letter this year.

Best Blessing--My husband got a promotion at his job in September.

Best Spiritual Moment--My youngest son trusted in Jesus as His Savior in June.

Best Fieldtrip--The girls and I went to the Laura Ingalls Wilder Home & Museum in Mansfield, Missouri.

Best Visitor--My brother came to visit all the way from Washington in August.

Best Restaurant--The Skies. It is a restaurant that rotates in the sky. We celebrated a friend's 40th birthday there.

Best Quote--"Faith is a desperate dive out of the sinking boat of human effort and a prayer that God will be there to pull us out of the water."--Max Lucado

Best Movie--The Great Raid. It was based on the true story of the Baton Death March during World War II. It was a very moving movie.

Biggest Accident--My younger daughter broke her arm and had to have surgery after falling off her bike.

Farthest place my husband traveled to--Salt Lake City, Utah so he could scope out the next Teen Missions Trip.

Most Exciting Person I met--I got to meet John Ashcroft and have my picture taken with him.

Firsts--
My youngest son played t-ball this summer
My oldest son starte Jujitsu
My youngest son start homeschooling with us, so all 4 kids are officially school age.
I started a blog.

So thats a little snapshot into my year. Let me know what some of your best moments were this year or firsts.


I also wanted to bring attention to a blog that The Conservative UAW guy and some of his friends started. It is a blog about the TV show 24. I am a huge fan of the show so I was excited to see it. If anyone else is a fan you can go check it out: Blogs 4 Bauer.

UPDATE:The Human Trafficking bill passed despite Biden's efforts. Cool :-).

Friday, December 23, 2005

Christmas



The more I listen to Rebecca St. James the more I like her. My favorite Christmas song this year is a song she sings entitled "A Cradle Prayer". It is a beautiful and simple song that reminds us of what Christmas is all about, being in awe of Jesus. Here are some of the words:

Jesus I love You my Lord my life
Where would I be without You
Here in the quiet, the still the night
I am in awe of You

Trials may come and friends they may go
What really matters is You, my Lord

Beautiful Savior my God, my friend
I am in awe of You

Why would You, Creator and King,
Come as a baby for all, for me

Beautiful Savior my God, my friend
I am in awe of You
I am in awe of You

I was thinking of making a list of all the liberals who should receive coal in their stockings but decided to focus on the positives instead :-). Maybe I'll make that list after Christmas.

This Christmas I am thankful for my family and friends. I am thankful for our awesome country. And May God Bless our wonderful President George W. Bush and our marvelous troops who are overseas. I want to encourage us all to pray for W and the troops. I was moved this week in hearing of an outpouring of cards and packages that were sent to wounded soldiers. Apparently one of them had received a hateful card and that prompted talk show hosts and others to encourage people to send good cards and people did. If I had heard earlier my kids and I would've done the same. To me this is what Christmas is all about. Our soldiers have helped defend our freedoms and the least we could do is wish them Merry Christmas. Semper Fi!!

And since I can never leave politics alone there are 2 articles that are worth checking out. I don't know about you but I've grown weary of liberals' and MSM media's constant attacks on W when he is working his tail off to protect this country. These excellent articles point out how ludicrous the attacks are. The first one I found at Rick's blog, Being Right. It is from the Walstreet Journal and is entitled "Thank-you For Wiretapping." The second one is by Benjamin Shapiro. He is a young guy but really sharp and I always like his columns. His article has a great title, "Democrat Spitballs Don't Cut It In Terror War".

And Merry Christmas to all of you in the blog world. I have enjoyed interacting with all of you this year.

Thursday, December 22, 2005

LMC's Smorgasbord of News

Grey Ghost started having his Potpourri of news and I was thinking of doing something similar at the same time. I came up with my own name of Smorgasbord. So when I have several news items to bring up it will be my smorgasbord of news :-). First of all today, I have one of those fun quick quizzes. I turned out to be Dancer but I noticed no matter who you turn out to be they have a naughty side for you. Take a quick few minutes and let me know who you are :-).

You Are Dancer

Carefree and fun, you always find reasons to do a happy dance.

Why You're Naughty: That dark stint you had as Santa's private dancer.

Why You're Nice: You're friendly. Very friendly.


Second, I stumbled upon a great new website called Lucianne.com. I remembered a long time ago Tony Snow mentioning it but then I noticed on Sean Hannity's website that he said he reads this site everyday. It has a lot of really good news articles on it.

Third, I have my first "I told you so" moment like Rush says on his show. On November 28th I had linked to an article "Truman bounced back--so will Bush". I mentioned that Reagan and Clinton had also bounced back from low poll numbers. And lo and behold W is already bouncing back, read "Public Swayed by Bush Speeches".

Fourth, this article is a must-read. A Patriot Acts by Ben Stein has some great questions and is very good. Here are a couple of questions he asks:
Is there any evidence at all of Americans' rights being trampled upon by the application of the Patriot Act? Are we any less free? Are there detention camps anywhere? Are opponents of Bush afraid to express themselves? Has anyone had his library card confiscated? Where is all of the harm that Bush's opponents claim? It is just plain invisible, a fantasy used to justify their own paranoia, isn't it? It is sort of the same as the fear that Californians and Manhattanites have of eating food with "chemicals" or "additives" in it. Pure self-obsessional thinking about imaginary victimhood to justify their frightened and aggressive existence.


Fifth, there is a very inspirational and encouraging article about Neil Cavuto. I don't know how many of you know of him but he is a great guy. He does the financial show on Fox News. I'm not that into the stock market but occasionally I hear some of what he says and I've heard him interviewed on other shows. He survived cancer only to find out he has MS. He has dealt with all his trials in a way that is very awe-inspiring. If you have a chance to read it you will be encouraged.

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

Human Trafficking Update

I did a post on Human Trafficking on December 8th. I have some good news and bad news for my update.

"Sweeping legislation to combat human trafficking unanimously passed the House last week and will soon be heading to the Senate."

To read the rest of the article go here.

Unfortunately one of our favorite senators is trying to hold it up in the senate. The following is an update I received from Focus on the Family:

"Urge Sen. Biden to Stop Blocking the Trafficking Bill

Last week, the House of Representatives passed the
Trafficking Victims’ Protection Reauthorization Act, H.R.
972, by an overwhelming vote of 426-0. The bill authorizes
funds for a variety of programs for victims of human
trafficking and provides for enhanced U.S. efforts to
combat trafficking. The legislation is now awaiting a
Senate vote before the President can sign it into law.
Unfortunately, for the second time in less than a week,
Democrats are holding a noncontroversial bill hostage.
Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., is preventing a vote on the
trafficking bill by attempting to amend it with
pro-abortion language.

Human trafficking is now the second-largest and
second-fastest-growing criminal enterprise in the world.
Every year, 600,000 to 800,000 people are trafficked
across international borders and held against their will,
primarily for sexual purposes. Half of these victims are
children. The Trafficking Victims’ Protection
Reauthorization Act will make great strides in protecting
women and children from trafficking, as well as helping
those who have fallen victim to trafficking.

TAKE ACTION: Biden needs to hear from you immediately. If
he continues to block a vote for the duration of this
week, the Trafficking Victims' Protection Act will not
reach the President's desk for signature until next year.
Please call Biden’s Delaware and Washington, D.C., offices
as soon as possible and respectfully urge him to stop
blocking a vote on the Trafficking Victims’ Protection Act
and to discontinue his efforts to amend it with
pro-abortion language. For this effort, phone calls are
preferred over e-mails."

Wilmington: 302-573-6345
Milford: 302-424-8090
Washington DC: 202-224-5042

I would encourage all of us to give Senator Biden a call :-).

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

You Go W!!!!



President Bush did a press conference yesterday morning right after doing a speech the night before. He is finally On Fire and I along with other conservatives are very happy to see it. Tony Snow mentioned a couple of weeks ago that the President needed to start firing back hard and often. It looks like someone in the White House was listening. All I can say is: Woo-hoo!!! It has been so hard to hear my President be continually demonized and not fight back when the truth is on his side.

The best part of the press conference was his defense of the much-needed Patriot Act. I need to do more studying of the Patriot Act myself but here is a link to some of the myths about it. I think even some conservatives and libertarians have misconceptions about what the Patriot Act actually says.

Anyway, here is his awesome (not so subtle) message to Pelosi, Chuckie Schumer, Hillary, and Reid:

"Let me say something about the Patriot Act, if you don't mind. It is inexcusable for the United States Senate to let this Patriot Act expire. You know, there's an interesting debate in Washington, and you're part of it, that says, well, they didn't connect the dots prior to September the 11th -- "they" being not only my administration, but previous administrations. And I understand that debate. I'm not being critical of you bringing this issue up and discussing it, but there was a -- you might remember, if you take a step back, people were pretty adamant about hauling people up to testify, and wondering how come the dots weren't connected.

Well, the Patriot Act helps us connect the dots. And now the United States Senate is going to let this bill expire. Not the Senate -- a minority of senators. And I want senators from New York or Los Angeles or Las Vegas to go home and explain why these cities are safer. It is inexcusable to say, on the one hand, connect the dots, and not give us a chance to do so. We've connected the dots, or trying to connect the dots with the NSA program. And, again, I understand the press and members of the United States Congress saying, are you sure you're safeguarding civil liberties. That's a legitimate question, and an important question. And today I hope I'll help answer that. But we're connecting dots as best as we possibly can."

I just loved it. Remember that great cheer Julia Roberts does on "Pretty Woman" when she's at the horse race? That's me cheering for W.


Rush made a very good point today about the Patriot Act. If the Patriot Act is indeed not renewed and we are attacked again guess who we are going to blame? All the Dems who voted for the filibuster (except Tim Johnson & Ben Nelson--the only 2 Dems who didn't vote for the filibuster) and the list of the 4 GOP senators who joined them--Chuck Hagel, Lisa Murkowski, John Sununu and Larry Craig.

Monday, December 19, 2005

"The Wrong Shall Fail, The Right Prevail"

The President gave an awesome speech last night. Bill Kristol said it was similar to FDR's fireside chats. I agree. I'm soooo glad the President has finally gone on the offensive instead of letting the anti-war zealots define him and the war.

My quote of the week was the words he said at the end of the speech. My title for this post also came from there. It was so well said. He was so honest in this speech. He took responsibility for his decisions and actions and yet called his critics to task. I printed the speech out to read it and highlight the good parts. Most of the speech is highlighted. I'm going to put a bunch of excerpts from the speech in this post but I thought one of the most critical lines was this one:

"We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them."

I so wish liberals could understand this. And I hope liberals and moderates were listening last night. I don't know how you criticize W after this heartfelt speech. He made several pleas to realize what is at stake especially in this line:

"Do not give in to despair, and do not give up on this fight for freedom."
The speech was so good that the liberal who was complaining about W after the speech just made me laugh. No matter what he says or does it will never be good enough. I felt like I was watching a Charlie Brown special and the democrat chic was the teacher and everything that came out of her mouth sounded like, "Wa, Wa, Wa..."

If you want to read the entire speech go here. Below I have posted some of the great excerpts.

"This election will not mean the end of violence. But it is the beginning of something new: constitutional democracy at the heart of the Middle East. And this vote -- 6,000 miles away, in a vital region of the world -- means that America has an ally of growing strength in the fight against terror.

He (Saddam)was given an ultimatum -- and he made his choice for war. And the result of that war was to rid a -- the world of a murderous dictator who menaced his people, invaded his neighbors, and declared America to be his enemy. Saddam Hussein, captured and jailed, is still the same raging tyrant -- only now without a throne. His power to harm a single man, woman, or child is gone forever. And the world is better for it.

I see a global terrorist movement that exploits Islam in the service of radical political aims -- a vision in which books are burned, and women are oppressed, and all dissent is crushed. Terrorist operatives conduct their campaign of murder with a set of declared and specific goals -- to de-moralize free nations, to drive us out of the Middle East, to spread an empire of fear across that region, and to wage a perpetual war against America and our friends. These terrorists view the world as a giant battlefield -- and they seek to attack us wherever they can. This has attracted al Qaeda to Iraq, where they are attempting to frighten and intimidate America into a policy of retreat.

The terrorists do not merely object to American actions in Iraq and elsewhere, they object to our deepest values and our way of life. And if we were not fighting them in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in Southeast Asia, and in other places, the terrorists would not be peaceful citizens, they would be on the offense, and headed our way.

September the 11th, 2001 required us to take every emerging threat to our country seriously, and it shattered the illusion that terrorists attack us only after we provoke them. On that day, we were not in Iraq, we were not in Afghanistan, but the terrorists attacked us anyway -- and killed nearly 3,000 men, women, and children in our own country. My conviction comes down to this: We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them. And we will defeat the terrorists by capturing and killing them abroad, removing their safe havens, and strengthening new allies like Iraq and Afghanistan in the fight we share.

We continue to see violence and suffering, caused by an enemy that is determined and brutal, unconstrained by conscience or the rules of war.

The terrorists will continue to have the coward's power to plant roadside bombs and recruit suicide bombers. And you will continue to see the grim results on the evening news. This proves that the war is difficult -- it doesn't mean that we are losing. Behind the images of chaos that terrorists create for the cameras, we are making steady gains with a clear objective in view.

Three days ago, more than 10 million Iraqis went to the polls -- including many Sunni Iraqis who had boycotted national elections last January.

One Iraqi, after dipping his finger in the purple ink as he cast his ballot, stuck his finger in the air and said: "This is a thorn in the eyes of the terrorists." Another voter was asked, "Are you Sunni or Shia?" And he responded, "I am Iraqi."

Today in Iraq, seven in 10 Iraqis say their lives are going well, and nearly two-thirds expect things to improve even more in the year ahead. Despite the violence, Iraqis are optimistic -- and that optimism is justified.

Yet there is a difference between honest critics who recognize what is wrong, and defeatists who refuse to see that anything is right.

Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. For every scene of destruction in Iraq, there are more scenes of rebuilding and hope. For every life lost, there are countless more lives reclaimed. And for every terrorist working to stop freedom in Iraq, there are many more Iraqis and Americans working to defeat them. My fellow citizens: Not only can we win the war in Iraq, we are winning the war in Iraq.
It is also important for every American to understand the consequences of pulling out of Iraq before our work is done. We would abandon our Iraqi friends and signal to the world that America cannot be trusted to keep its word. We would undermine the morale of our troops by betraying the cause for which they have sacrificed. We would cause the tyrants in the Middle East to laugh at our failed resolve, and tighten their repressive grip. We would hand Iraq over to enemies who have pledged to attack us and the global terrorist movement would be emboldened and more dangerous than ever before. To retreat before victory would be an act of recklessness and dishonor, and I will not allow it.
Our forces in Iraq are on the road to victory -- and that is the road that will take them home.

And tonight, I ask all of you listening to carefully consider the stakes of this war, to realize how far we have come and the good we are doing, and to have patience in this difficult, noble, and necessary cause.

And the need for victory is larger than any president or political party, because the security of our people is in the balance. I don't expect you to support everything I do, but tonight I have a request: Do not give in to despair, and do not give up on this fight for freedom.

And I have never been more certain that America's actions in Iraq are essential to the security of our citizens, and will lay the foundation of peace for our children and grandchildren.

Next week, Americans will gather to celebrate Christmas and Hanukkah. Many families will be praying for loved ones spending this season far from home -- in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other dangerous places. Our nation joins in those prayers. We pray for the safety and strength of our troops. We trust, with them, in a love that conquers all fear, in a light that reaches the darkest corners of the Earth. And we remember the words of the Christmas carol, written during the Civil War: "God is not dead, nor [does] He sleep; the Wrong shall fail, the Right prevail, with peace on Earth, goodwill to men."
Thank you, and good night."


P.S. Brit Hume did an awesome special on the separation of church and state last night. If they re-air it, it is a must-see.

Sunday, December 18, 2005

"Grace For The Moment"

On sundays I am going to try and take a diversion from politics. Right now I am reading a devotional entitled, "Grace For The Moment" by Max Lucado. It is excellent and has been a Godsend for me this year. It has been inspirational, encouraging and comforting for me.

Today I would like to focus on one of the devotionals. This one is entitled "God's Plans". For 2 yrs. now I have felt God leading me in a different direction. I have always been a stay-at-home mom and homeschooled my children. My "baby" is now 6 yrs. old and since I have all school-aged children I see God leading me to pursue some other avenues. As you know from this blog my passion is politics. I am praying about pursuing politics, writing or something along those lines. And as a result I am hoping to be able to send my kids to private school next year. It will be a big transition for all of us and I am very nervous and excited about it at the same time. For those of you who pray I would covet your prayers. The following devotional is so in line with my thoughts and is so inspirational for me. I hope it encourages some of you too.

"Psalm 37:4--Delight yourself in the Lord and he will give you the desires of the heart.

When we submit to God's plans, we can trust our desires. Our assignment is found at the intersection of God's plan and our pleasures. What do you love to do? What brings you joy? What gives you a sense of satisfaction?
Some long to feed the poor. Others enjoy leading the church...Each of us has been made to serve God in a unique way...
The longings of your heart, then, are not incidental; they are critical messages. The desires of your heart are not to be ignored; they are to be consulted. As the wind turns the weather vane, so God uses your passions to turn your life. God is too gracious to ask you to do something you hate."

---Max Lucado

Friday, December 16, 2005

Over My Dead Body

Okay, I told you I wouldn't be able to make it to tomorrow for this post. I am Furious!!!! I am mad! Let's see, the last time I was this upset it involved a certain senator. That's right, the last time I was this mad it also involved McCain. I see a recurring theme. McCain loves to stab Republicans and the American people in the back.

He has been pushing his so-called torture ban and unbeknownst to me the senate had already approved it by 90-9. (My senators better be two of the 9 or they'll be hearing from me.) And yesterday the House gave veto-proof support for it by 308-122. So even though I was upset with W yesterday I now realize he was backed into a corner. He had been trying to weaken the measure but to no avail. In an article this is what McCain said about his ridiculous ban:

"The deal shows that the United States "upholds values and standards of behavior and treatment of all people, no matter how evil or bad they are," McCain said Thursday. The agreement will "help us enormously in winning the war for the hearts and minds of people throughout the world in the war on terror."


I apologize for my language but this is complete BS. This does nothing more than weaken the U.S. and endanger the lives of our soldiers. Instead of being able to press terrorists for info that will save lives they will be able to get a lawyer and whine about their inhumane treatment. Meanwhile the terrorists don't bat an eye as they behead innocent men and women. I'm sorry but this WILL NOT help us "win the hearts and minds of people around the world". They all hate us and this will probably lower their respect level for us. You want your enemies to fear you, not think you are kind to terrorists.

McCain thinks he has a chance at the Republican nomination in 2008. Hah!!! I was talking to a friend of mine this summer after McCain had stabbed conservatives in the back with his judicial filibuster compromise. She is normally a pretty laid back person but we both agreed Over my dead body is McCain getting the Republican nomination in 2008. I know this is strong language but I despise McCain. He has done more to damage this country than a lot of democrats. The main mistake I think W has made as President is when he agreed to McCain's campaign finance bill. The last time I checked free speech was protected in the constitution. All of this to say McCain wins my GMWAS award today, hands down.

In other bad news the Patriot Act was not renewed today. This is a huge blow to the war on terror and very disappointing to me. So I guess we've had good news and bad news this week.

"A Day to Be Proud"


First, I want to revel in yesterday's huge victory. It was truly a day to be remembered and a day to be proud. (Right now I am furious over the news that W has given into McCain's supposed torture ban. But I am going to hold off on that for another post. I probably won't be able to wait until tomorrow but it at least needs to be in a separate post :-).)

The turnout was large and for the most part peaceful. An article that describes how things went is: "Polls Close After Iraqi Voters Turn Out in Droves". For those of you liberals that have been asking why Iraq? I think this Iraqi man gives a good answer: "I am proud as an Iraqi because our country is becoming a center of attraction for all Arab countries," said Mohammed Wadi, a 50-year-old Shiite schoolteacher casting his ballot in the capital's Karada district. The new situation in Iraq, the democratic system, is starting to put pressure on the Arab systems to make some changes toward democracy."

Ben Elliott, former director of speech writing in the Reagan Administration, writes a good article entitled, December 15th Is a Day To Remember. He says that it "is a day in history that will change the world." And on the Power Line blog they describe it as "A Day To Be Proud". They tell an inspiring story of a Vietnam Vet and then conclude by saying, "It seems to me that we are witnessing the legacy of the hundreds of thousands of Americans who have served and sacrificed like Rescorla to make this day possible."

It was a day of great victory, an awesome day for the cause of freedom and a day to be proud. And to all the naysayers (Murtha, Kerry, Dean, Pelosi, Kennedy, Durbin, etc.)you will be forgotten but W will be remembered as a man who protected America and the world and brought Freedom to Afghanistan and Iraq and possibly the Middle East.

P.S. Also read Oliver North's inspiring column entitled E-day in Iraq.

P.P.S. Rich Lowry has written a great article on the democrats' response to Iraq in "Dazed and Confused on Iraq".

Thursday, December 15, 2005

Iraqi Update


My post yesterday was a little long so I will make this short and sweet. If you haven't had the chance to read yesterday's you might take the time because I had some good and encouraging articles in it.

Today I just HAD to post the comments of this awesome Iraqi woman. Rush played her comments several times on his show and I thought, now that is great. Her name is Betty Dawisha and this is what she said: “Anybody who doesn’t appreciate what America has done and President Bush, let them go to hell.” Can't say it much more eloquently than that :-).




On another unrelated note Brit Hume interviewed W yesterday. It was a fairly good interview. And I was once again proud of him for not being afraid to speak his mind. Brit asked him what he thought about Tom Delay and his situation. W didn't even hesitate and said he likes Tom Delay and wants to see him stay majority leader. Politics might've dictated W keeping his distance but if W likes you he's loyal. And I was glad to see it because I like Tom Delay and I'm not afraid to say it even though he's been demonized by the MSM. He has a backbone and principles and there's a lot of Republicans (we won't even mention democrats) who can't say that.

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Iraq



Since the Iraqi Elections are tomorrow I thought I would highlight some of the positive things that are happening there. The MSM keeps us up to date on all the negatives and even makes some up so this blog will err on the side of being encouraging and postitive.

The first item I have is a personal story that is from a friend of a friend. I got permission to post it here as long as there were no names mentioned.

"Because I can't stop smiling. . .
. .I have to tell you all the most awesome thing I've heard in months. Today I had breakfast with my friend who is Iraqi. She and her family fled Iraq when she was very young because her uncles and a bunch of other relatives had already been killed in an ethnic cleansing campaign. She hasn't seen her country in twenty years, but she still loves it very much. This morning she was late to breakfast, which is totally not like her, and when she came in she was grinning from ear to ear and her index finger was purple. That's the symbol of support for voting in Iraq because, in order to prevent voter fraud, the poll workers dip your finger in purple ink once you've received a ballot. When she walked in this morning, she grabbed my arm (which is way strange for her--she's even less touchy-feely than I am), shook me and said, "I did it! I voted!" And then she hugged me and both of us burst into tears.

Guys, this is SO huge. For her to be allowed to vote in a free election for the first time in her life is so amazing I can't even express it. She went to the polling place at 6:30 this morning because she wanted to be there when the doors opened, and at 8am both she and her 57-year-old mother voted for the very first time in their lives.

Last time, more than 60% of the country turned out to vote, and they expect numbers to be even higher this time because the promised attacks from last time fell so short. Those of you who pray, please keep the Iraqi people, and the Iraqi and coalition soldiers who will guard the polling places in your prayers for the election on Thursday."


Apparently people in the U.S. and all over the world were allowed to vote in the Iraqi elections yesterday as long as they are still Iraqi citizens. Very cool story.

The second item is some positive things that were reported by ABC News of all places.

Dec. 12, 2005 —"Surprising levels of optimism prevail in Iraq with living conditions improved, security more a national worry than a local one, and expectations for the future high. But views of the country's situation overall are far less positive, and there are vast differences in views among Iraqi groups — a study in contrasts between increasingly disaffected Sunni areas and vastly more positive Shiite and Kurdish provinces.

An ABC News poll in Iraq, conducted with Time magazine and other media partners, includes some remarkable results: Despite the daily violence there, most living conditions are rated positively, seven in 10 Iraqis say their own lives are going well, and nearly two-thirds expect things to improve in the year ahead.

Campaigning Stops a Day Ahead of Iraq Vote
Iraq's Wolf Brigade Said to Be Effective, at Times Brutal
Securing the Election
Surprisingly, given the insurgents' attacks on Iraqi civilians, more than six in 10 Iraqis feel very safe in their own neighborhoods, up sharply from just 40 percent in a poll in June 2004. And 61 percent say local security is good — up from 49 percent in the first ABC News poll in Iraq in February 2004.

Nonetheless, nationally, security is seen as the most pressing problem by far; 57 percent identify it as the country's top priority. Economic improvements are helping the public mood.

Average household incomes have soared by 60 percent in the last 20 months (to $263 a month), 70 percent of Iraqis rate their own economic situation positively, and consumer goods are sweeping the country. In early 2004, 6 percent of Iraqi households had cell phones; now it's 62 percent. Ownership of satellite dishes has nearly tripled, and many more families now own air conditioners (58 percent, up from 44 percent), cars, washing machines and kitchen appliances.

Life In Iraq: Percent Saying Good

In Your Life 70%
For Country 44%

There are positive political signs as well. Three-quarters of Iraqis express confidence in the national elections being held this week, 70 percent approve of the new constitution, and 70 percent — including most people in Sunni and Shiite areas alike — want Iraq to remain a unified country.

Interest in politics has soared.

Preference for a democratic political structure has advanced, to 57 percent of Iraqis, while support for an Islamic state has lost ground, to 14 percent (the rest, 26 percent, chiefly in Sunni Arab areas, favor a "single strong leader.")

Whatever the current problems, 69 percent of Iraqis expect things for the country overall to improve in the next year — a remarkable level of optimism in light of the continuing violence there. However, in a sign of the many challenges ahead, this optimism is far lower in Sunni Arab-dominated provinces, where just 35 percent are optimistic about the country's future."


Ofcourse the article went on to list a bunch of negatives also. It wouldn't be an article from the MSM if they didn't. If you would like to read the whole article go here.

The third item is a good article by Thomas Sowell. Here are some excerpts:

"Our troops can kill ten times as many of the enemy as they kill and it just isn't news worth featuring, if it is mentioned at all, in much of the media. No matter how many towns are wrested from the control of the terrorists by American or Iraqi troops, it just isn't front-page news like the casualty reports or even the doom-saying of some politicians.


The fact that these doom-saying politicians have been proved wrong, again and again, does not keep their latest outcries from overshadowing the hard-won victories of American troops on the ground in Iraq.

The doom-sayers claimed that terrorist attacks would make it impossible to hold the elections last January because so many Iraqis would be afraid to go vote. The doom-sayers urged that the elections be postponed.


But a higher percentage of Iraqis voted in that election — and in a subsequent election — than the percentage of Americans who voted in last year's Presidential elections.


Utter ignorance of history enables any war with any casualties to be depicted in the media as an unmitigated disaster.
Even after Nazi Germany surrendered at the end of World War II, die-hard Nazi guerrilla units terrorized and assassinated both German officials and German civilians who cooperated with Allied occupation authorities.


But nobody suggested that we abandon the country. Nobody was foolish enough to think that you could say in advance when you would pull out or that you should encourage your enemies by announcing a timetable.


There has never been the slightest doubt that we would begin pulling troops out of Iraq when it was feasible. Only time and circumstances can tell when that will be. And only irresponsible politicians and the media think otherwise."

Tuesday, December 13, 2005

Awesome Sign, Tag, Rush & Clooney


I found the photo of this awesome sign at Texas Fred's and couldn't resist posting it. I think this says it all and speaks for itself.

I've fallen prey to the Blog Tag and since as Robosquirrel said there is no immunity I have at least 5 weird habits that I can share.

1) I wouldn't consider myself obsessive compulsive but I'm one of those people that check my doors several times every night to make sure they are locked.

2) I drink lots of caffeine free coke and love candy bars.

3) I'm a night owl.

4) I don't like to cook and like to eat out but workout at the gym hoping somehow that will compensate :-).

5) I like to go to sleep watching Little House on the Prairie or a Jane Austen movie.


We got some good news yesterday when Rush Limbaugh finally had a legal victory in the Florida courts. This witchunt against Rush has been so ridiculous even the ACLU has been trying to help him.

George Clooney is getting in line behind Tim Robbins to also express his dislike of Hillary for not being liberal enough. I must admit I'm getting a lot of enjoyment out of the fact that Hillary isn't good enough for the Hollywood Left.

Monday, December 12, 2005

"Conservative Weblogs outdo Liberal Sites"

The post I was wanting to do today had a key picture that I needed to use. I can't get it to work so I will have to save that post for wednesday.

Anyway, today's post will have a key article I want to highlight and some other miscellaneous comments that I want to make. I came across this article on World Net Daily the other day and thought it was very encouraging :-):

"MEDIA MATTERS
Conservative weblogs
outdo liberal sites
New York Times magazine feature
sees them as 'more effective'

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: December 10, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A story in the New York Times Sunday magazine declares conservative blogs continue to have more political and electoral influence than liberal blogs.
Titled "Conservative Blogs Are More Effective," Michael Crowley's piece in the magazine's 5th Annual Year in Ideas cover package claims that with the 2006 elections approaching, Democrats are now "trying to use blogs more strategically," says the trade publication Editor & Publisher.


But Crowley – citing Democrat activist Matt Stoller, who ran a blog for Sen. Jon Corzine in his recent race for New Jersey governor – believes conservative blogs will once again have the upper hand next year.

Stoller points to a recent example in New Jersey where talk radio picked up on personal charges against Corzine published by conservative blogs which caused "damage" to the campaign.

"To Stoller, it was proof of how conservatives have mastered the art of using blogs as a deadly campaign weapon," Crowley writes, according to Editor & Publisher. "Yet Corzine won the election easily anyway."

Some might point to Howard Dean's massive web-driven presidential campaign and heavy traffic for liberal blogs such as DailyKos as counterarguments. But Crowley writes Democrats "say there's a key difference between liberals and conservatives online."

"Liberals use the Web to air ideas and vent grievances with one another, often ripping into Democratic leaders," he says, while conservatives, "by contrast, skillfully use the Web to provide maximum benefit for their issues and candidates."

Crowley believes, though, that what truly makes conservative blogs effective is the infrastructure provided by the Fox News Channel and radio giants such as Rush Limbaugh, all of which are quick to pass on the latest tidbit from the blogosphere."




So I thought that was encouraging. As it has been said many times Conservatives flourish wherever there is true competition.

Now for my short Entertainment Media update. I watched "Kingdom of Heaven" this weekend on DVD. I had heard it touted by conservatives that this movie made Muslims look good and Christians look bad. So initially I had no desire to see it. But a friend insisted that it was pretty good so I thought I would give it a try. It actually was fairly good and worth seeing in my opinion. I look forward to seeing the "History vs. Hollywood" section from the History Channel that is on the 2nd disk. The History channel usually does a good job of telling you what in the movie was true and what was just Hollywood.

As I had mentioned my kids and I watch "Survivor". For those of you fellow "Survivor" fans you know the Guatemala finale was on last night. We really wanted Stephanie to win and were very disappointed that she didn't. But at least she came in 2nd place.

And finally I wanted to mention that I found my quote of the week on Sacto Dan's blog. I liked it so much I had to use it also. And my verse of the week is a common phrase that Sean Hannity always says. As you know I am a big fan of his and there is something about the way he says, "Don't let your heart be troubled" that just makes me feel like it will all be okay. So with the stress that usually accompanies this time of year I figured it would be nice to be reminded that our hearts don't need to be troubled :-).

Saturday, December 10, 2005

Calvin & Hobbes & Snowmen








Another scary thing you need to know about me is my husband and I love Calvin & Hobbes and that is where we got another one of my children's names from. Sometimes he acts too much like Calvin from Calvin & Hobbes and I think, what was I thinking?:-). Anyway now that I know how to do the picture thing I thought it would be fun to post some snowmen cartoons.

Friday, December 09, 2005

News Rundown




Once a week or so I will probably do a news rundown since too many articles
accumulate that are worth mentioning. The first one is about Mel Gibson's possible new project. As some of you know I am a huge fan of Mel Gibson for many reasons. Braveheart is my favorite movie of all time so I love the Braveheart pictures :-). Anyway, he may be doing a new miniseries on the Holocaust. I can't wait. Because if he has anything to do with it, it will be awesome.

That was my good news. Now onto the other 3 articles that aren't so good. The next one is the rumor that Rumsfeld might leave and that Lieberman would be a good replacement. I can't tell you how much I am repulsed by that thought. As per my post earlier this week I love Rumsfeld and have a lot of respect for him and don't think anyone could do the job near as good as him. And even with that said there are a million people I would pick before Lieberman. I give Lieberman credit for standing up to his own party but thats about where my respect for him ends. You have to be a lot tougher and more conservative than Lieberman to be Secretary of Defense in my opinion. Thank goodness Rumsfeld has already spoken up and said he isn't leaving. Thank God!!

Next is an issue that just irritates me. Joseph Farah is the editor of World Net Daily. I love the website and go there every day for my news. But Farah is an extremist in my opinion. During the 2004 election he upset me numerous times by bashing Bush for not being conservative enough. Here I was working my butt off campaigning for Bush and we had people from our own side actively working against him. He wrote at least one editorial describing why he wouldn't be voting for Bush. It was so disheartening to me because who was he going to vote for that would be better? And in the process he was influencing a lot of people. Anyway, all that to say he has done something that has irritated me again. He is being very critical of W for saying Happy Holidays on the Whitehouse Christmas card instead of Merry Christmas. Give me a break. Do we not have better things to do with our time instead of being so petty? I personally am just very excited to get a Christmas card from the White House each year. Tony Snow was talking about it on his show and was saying how ridiculous it was. It has been the standard of the White House to say Happy Holidays in their cards for many years. I know we are trying to take back Christmas from the ACLU types and I support that but this is a little too much. Relax people.

The last article is more than annoying, it is upsetting. One of my GMWAS award winners is at it again. Michael Schiavo is starting a PAC (Political Action Committee)with Terri's name on it to help liberals get elected. Can we drag Terri's name and memory thru the mud anymore? What another slap in the face to her parents. One can only imagine that she is rolling over in her grave that her name is being used against the very people who wanted to save her life.

Thursday, December 08, 2005

Human Trafficking

I watched a movie recently on Human Trafficking. Below is an article from Focus on the Family about it. My eyes were opened to how widespread this is and how truly horrific it is. If your daughter gets sold into this and even if you get her back she will be scarred for life. It is a very scary prospect to me. One of the scariest things is how they often times take very young girls. When I have the time I am going to do more research on this. If you have a chance make sure you call your member of congress. I also urge you to visit the Shared Hope International website which I have linked.


December 7, 2005

Sex Trafficking Now No. 2 International Crime
by Pete Winn, associate editor

"Taking women and children by force and selling them as sex slaves is a greater tragedy than ever.Human trafficking is now tied with the illegal arms trade as the second-largest and second-fastest-growing criminal enterprise in the world—both of them trailing only the illicit drug trade.

According to the United Nations, more than 30 million people are literal slaves around the world—most held against their will for sexual purposes. Every year, 600,000 to 800,000 victims are trafficked across international borders, half of them children.

Dr. Janice Crouse, senior fellow at the Beverly LaHaye Institute at Concerned Women for America, said sex trafficking has become a $10 billion a year industry.

"It is absolutely astounding when you think that over 30 million people are caught in this form of modern day slavery," Crouse said. "That's what the president has called it, and that's what it actually is, really, because the people who are trafficked get very little of the money—'s the pimps and big-time criminals who are getting rich off the sex trafficking of little children and women."

Former Congresswoman Linda Smith, who heads the anti-trafficking organization Shared Hope International, has been fighting sex trafficking for the last eight years—from inside and outside of Congress.

She first discussed the problem with Focus on the Family Chairman Dr. James Dobson on a series of broadcasts in 2003.

"We had people literally call who had pulled off the road and were crying," Smith said. "They just could not believe what they heard as we told the stories of some of the women we've rescued around the world."

Smith said she's always thought the numbers of those caught in human trafficking could be even higher than statistics for the illegal arms trade or drug trafficking.

"We have thought for a long time that all three of those products went to market in somewhat the same way, along the same path, with the same bad guys," Smith said. "Part of that is funded by really bad criminal enterprises in the world. And a lot of those are the same people that are involved in terrorism."

The former congresswoman from Washington State can cite plenty of cases to illustrate what she's talking about. There's Hope, for instance, a young woman Shared Hope International has been helping.

"She's 14 and she was trafficked out of Africa into Amsterdam—one of the marketplaces of victimization that most people would know about," Smith told CitizenLink. "Hope was made to service many men a day—standing at a window. They would dress her up like a woman and have her smile—and if she didn't, she didn't get to eat. Then they would pull the curtain and she would service the men.

"She was raising about a thousand euro a day (more than $1,000), seven days a week. She was making more than a quarter of a million a year for them."

And you can find exactly the same kind of thing in America.

"I can show you the same thing in a ring we just discovered just walking distance from the Capitol," Smith said, "of Korean girls being brought in—brought to New York first—and then sold here to people that come in for business or tourism right here in D.C."

The trafficker, she added, doesn't really care where he brings his slaves—as long as there is a marketplace. Indeed, some women and children are actually being sold over the Internet.

"Most of the sales of this product are going the same way as the sales of shoes, the sales of cars and other things," Smith said. "It is a product, so yes, there are sales online."

Both Crouse and Smith say the Bush administration has made stopping trafficking a priority, with the president committing $50 million to restore and help victims.

Crouse, who has worked for nearly a decade to combat sex trafficking, said there won't be a reduction in the sex trade, though, until demand is addressed.

"While the U.N. blames social and economic disparities for fostering trafficking, the demand for prostitutes is the driving force behind sex trafficking where the victims overwhelmingly are women and girls," Crouse said.

There is action in Congress right now, she noted, on legislation sponsored by Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., which would work to end the demand for sex slaves.

H.R. 972, the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005, is being finalized in the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday.

"We have to make it a bad thing to buy sex," Smith said, "because the reality is, it's going after younger and younger people—and the depravity is cycling down."

Shared Hope International, meanwhile, also is planning an upcoming education campaign.

TAKE ACTION
The House Judiciary Committee on Thursday will finish marking up Rep. Chris Smith's bill, H.R. 972. It will be up to the leadership of the House whether to bring up the bill this year—or wait.

Please take time to urge your member of Congress to support H.R. 972—and encourage the House leadership to bring the measure for a vote right away.


For help in contacting your lawmakers, please see the CitizenLink Action Center.

To learn more about Shared Hope International and Concerned Women for America, please see their respective Web sites."

Wednesday, December 07, 2005

Trolls

Please note I have changed my header a little bit to include my philosophy on how to deal with trolls. I am not against healthy debate. But with that said I'm also not going to waste my time arguing with liberals who enjoy personal attacks. As many of you know I recently had problems with a troll who goes by the title PB. He doesn't have his own blog but seems to like to go to conservative blogs and stir up trouble. He made a comment about Donald Rumsfeld that was the usual liberal mantra and was out of context. To be honest I don't have the time or energy to debate liberals on every single topic and that was not the purpose or design of this blog. He then resorted to personal attacks because he was upset that I had deleted his comments. That only confirmed to me I had made the right decision initially to delete his comments.

I've noticed that every blogger seems to have a different philosophy on how to deal with liberals. Mahndisa considers herself to be an independent and enjoys most people's comments and welcomes almost any and all debate. My hats off to her for being so open-minded. Exile seems to relish debating liberals and even has a trophy troll room. On the other hand Phantom makes it very clear that he doesn't even want liberals on his site at all. Ranting Republican says her blog is a place to vent her conservative views and if you are a liberal, find another blog. I am probably somewhere in between these two camps. If you are a respectful liberal and the topic you want to debate interests me then I might engage. Otherwise I don't enjoy wasting my time debating something I know will not change either of our minds. I also detest personal attacks and do not want to engage in them. I remembered a verse my dad showed me in highschool when I kept arguing with a guy at school who just enjoyed arguing with people just to upset them. Proverbs 26:4--Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you will be like him yourself. I have no wish to do this.

The resident liberal who comes to my blog is James who also frequents Mahndisa's & Rebecca's blogs also. We have had spirited debates but still remain respectful towards each other without descending into personal attacks. We don't agree on very much politically but have other interests in common. And speaking of this he has posted a hilarious column today on how to deal with trolls. I was laughing so hard I had tears in my eyes. But I will warn you that there is profanity involved so go there at your own risk :-).

That is my philosophy in a nutshell. If you are a liberal you will probably not enjoy much about my blog and I ask you to refrain from personal attacks. If you think you have a valid point to be debated you are welcome to try but I will not guarantee that I will debate you and if you are out of line your comments will be deleted. As Rush says, he is a benevolent dictator of his radio show and he gets to determine what gets said and who says it. This is my blog and I get to determine the message that I want sent. As conservatives we have to deal with the liberal drivel everywhere in the MSM. Conservatives flourish on talk radio and the internet where there is true competition. If you are a liberal you are free to start your own blog and rehash all the MSM drivel but don't get mad if you're not allowed to post it here.

Tuesday, December 06, 2005

Triple Winners

I was trying to decide who should get the GMWAS (Gag Me With a Spoon) award and it ended up being a tie between 3 people so they will all receive the honor. I am very disheartened at these 3 men for how they are dishonoring our troops and our country. Protesting and voicing opposition is one thing but I feel that all 3 of these men have crossed the line into "treasonous" waters. They are voicing reckless statements for all the world to hear and trying to create a "Vietnam quagmire" out of a war that has made a lot of progress. Bloviating Zeppelin wrote a good post on our successes over there. Please take the time to read it. Anyway, onto the awards.

The first recipient has been awarded the moonbat award by Bloviating Zeppelin twice. It is Congressman John P. "Jack" Murtha. He is the one who made the infamous call to pull the troops of out Iraq in 6 months time. And he continues to blather on trying to cash in on his 15 minutes of fame. Zeppelin has called him a "Chamberlain" and I couldn't think of a better way to describe him. Again, I picture the scary looking guy from Braveheart who believes in compromise.

The second recipient is someone Michael Reagan wants to have hung. Howard Dean had the audacity to say that we won't win in Iraq. I just can't put into words how discouraging this must be for our brave fighting men and women to hear. And how scary for Iraqis to hear this and have the fear that we will abandon them.

The third recipient is a man I can't believe was ever considered presidential by anyone. Our beloved John Kerry wants the world to believe that our soldiers are terrorists. I just can't fathom how anyone can say this about their troops and their own country. Do these men relish in the destruction and disheartenment of their own fellow Americans? It just makes me really sad and discouraged that these men would stoop to these levels just to score political points.

It will be very interesting to see how history will view these men. I predict that 20 years from now we will see Bush in the same way that we now view Reagan. Reagan ended the cold war while the democrats howled and screamed that it could never be done. I think we will see many successes from Bush's War on Terror and we will admire him for sticking to what he knew was right while the democrats howled and screamed that it couldn't be done.

Monday, December 05, 2005

"Rumsfeld Spanks the Media"

Okay, this is AWESOME!! I found this on Real Clear Politics, on their blog site. I have to mention that I love Donald Rumsfeld. I have so much respect and admiration for him. In fact now that I think about it he should've been on my heroes list. And to show you what a political news junkie I am instead of having dreams about movie stars or other things I once had a dream that I met Donald Rumsfeld and got to have this great political discussion with him. Anyway all that to say I loved what this article had to say.

"Rumsfeld Spanks Media
I was under the impression Rumsfeld's speech at the SAIS today was about Iraq - and it was. But sandwiched between a recitation of Bush's "stay the course" rhetoric from the other day was a classic Rumsfeldian rebuke of the media's coverage of the war:


The media serves a valuable -- indeed an indispensable -- role in informing our society and holding government to account. But I would submit it is also important for the media to hold itself to account.

We have arrived at a strange time in this country where the worst about America and our military seems to be so quickly taken as truth by the press and reported and spread around the world -- with little or no context or scrutiny -- let alone correction or accountability -- even after the fact. Speed it appears is often the first goal, not accuracy, not context.

Recently there were claims by two Iraqis on a speaking tour that U.S. soldiers threw them in a cage with lions. Their charges were widely reported -- still without substantiation. Not too long ago, there was a false and damaging story about a Koran supposedly flushed down a toilet, and in the riots that followed people were killed. And a recent New York Times editorial implied America’s armed forces -- your armed forces -- use tactics reminiscent of Saddam Hussein.

I understand that there may be great pressure on them to tell a dramatic story. And while it is easy to use a bombing or a terrorist attack to support a belief that Iraq is a failure, that is not the accurate picture. And further, it is not good journalism.

Consider this: You couldn’t tell the full story of Iwo Jima simply by listing the nearly 26,000 American casualties over about 40 days; or explain the importance of Grant’s push to Virginia just by noting the savagery of the battles. So too, in Iraq, it is appropriate to note not only how many Americans have been killed -- and may God bless them and their families -- but what they died for -- or more accurately, what they lived for.

So I suggest to editors and reporters -- whose good intentions I take for granted -- to do some soul searching. To ask: how will history judge -- if it does -- the reporting decades from now when Iraq’s path is settled?

I would urge us all to make every effort to ensure we are telling the whole story. To take a moment for self-reflection and reassessment."



The line about asking reporters to do some soul searching is brilliant. I lOVE how Rumsfeld is one of the only conservatives that takes the media to task. Brit Hume once aired a clip from Saturday Night Live about Rumsfeld. It was hilarious. It showed how the media was scared of Rumsfeld and how he just made mincemeat of them. It was great. In a perfect world W should take lessons and be a little more "Rumsfeld" when dealing with the media. I can always dream.

Sunday, December 04, 2005

"Have You Forgotten?"

I just wanted to make a quick post about some images that I discovered and now have on the side of my blog. I was at Rebekah's blog and saw these images from 9/11 on there. I think it is SO IMPORTANT never to forget 9/11. Like Darryl Worley says in his awesome song, "Have You Forgotten?" these images should be on TV a lot more so it wouldn't be so easy for people to forget. You can go to Cap'n Bob's to get them on yours too if you like them.

Friday, December 02, 2005

Favorite TV Shows

Mahndisa did a post awhile back on favorite Tv shows. I meant to do one right after her and I had to go out of town and other more pressing subjects came up so it was delayed. Since I have a nightmare weekend ahead of me (between my 4 kids we have gymnastics, karate, 2 birthday parties and choir rehearsal tomorrow). Plus my youngest son is having his 6th Birthday party on sunday and somewhere in between all of this I'm supposed to put my tree up and decorate my house. I get tired just thinking about it. Anyway all of this to say I wanted to post a light, fun subject for the weekend.

I must confess that after being a political news junkie I am also into movies and TV and pop culture. I am fairly selective but my interests range from "Legally Blonde" to "Black Hawk Down" so go figure. In college everyone tried to figure out how I could be into Harley Davidsons and Precious Moments at the same time. I have varied interests. I've also noticed that between my 2 daughters they make up my complete personality. The older one is the "precious moments" side of me and the younger one is definitely the "Harley Davidson" side of me :-). Coincidentally we named the younger one Harley so what did I expect :-)?

All that aside here are some of my favorite TV shows from the past and present. Let me know what some of your favorites are.

TV Shows

1) Little House on the Prairie (oldie but goodie, whenever life is bad put a LHOP episode in and everything is right with the world :-))
2) Alias (Love this show, wish I could be Sydney :-))
3) 24 (Gotta love Kiefer Sutherland)
4) That 70's Show (I just started watching the reruns of this lately and it is hilarious. I have never watched a show that made me laugh as much.)
5) Seinfeld (my favorite comedy, all of my friends know that I consider EVERYTHING in life relates to a seinfeld episode, and it is amazing how many times it comes up)
6) Survivor (yes I'm into some reality shows, my kids and I actually watch this together)
7) ER
8) Dawson's Creek (Okay so I have to confess I like some of the melodrama :-))
9) Fear Factor (my daughter and I would to like to go on this show)
10) Roswell (Most of you have probably never heard of this show. One of my very close friends got me hooked on watching all 3 seasons of this. The 1st season is awesome and then they torture you in seasons 2 & 3. Despite all the torture it was still a great show :-).


I have more but those will do for now. Let me know your favorites. I think we are always surprised at what shows we think people will like and then what they actually do like.

P.S. I must admit that it was a lot of fun everytime I came to my blog yesterday and saw my title from that post "Hillary Clinton can kiss my butt" :-).

Thursday, December 01, 2005

"Hillary Clinton Can Kiss My Butt"

Okay, 3 guesses which conservative said this. Guess what? It wasn't a conservative but our favorite left-leaning Hollywood Activist, Tim Robbins. I personally loved Robbins in "Shawshank Redemption" but other than that his activism has gotten pretty loony.

Apparently he was on Air America this morning. I guess he is upset with Hillary for pretending to be a moderate by saying certain things about the war. So among his comments he said "Hillary Clinton can kiss my butt...". That just made my day and I got a good laugh out of it.

I also read today that Hillary may be getting some competition from the green party in '08. If you're a democrat it is quite the dilemma. Either appease the Michael Moores of the world by being a leftist loony or try pretending to be a centrist and get competition from the green party. What is a liberal democrat to do?

UPDATE: I found these great political cartoons on Robosquirrel's blog. They are called Day by Day by Chris Muir. He has a new one up each day and they are great. You might want to check them out.